GDS: Post Collapse Recovery detected on 9 Sep 2026

All prices, scores, and news on this page reflect data available before market open on .

Browse all Post Collapse Recovery detections →

On 9 Sep 2026, our scan flagged GDS as a post collapse recovery setup scoring 63 out of 98 (Moderate tier), with a 59% win probability based on our historical pattern database and a 0.89 to 1 risk to reward profile from the published levels. This is a swing trade setup: win probability reflects a multi-day swing hold, not an intraday move. At $32.00, the conservative target is $34.52 with a stop at $29.16. A further breakout above resistance near $36.07 offers a larger move if momentum continues past the initial target.

Overall Score
63 of 98
Moderate
Win Probability
59%
Low
Trade R:R
0.89 : 1
$2.52 to target $2.84 to stop
Swing Trading Plan
Entry
$32.00
Target
$34.52
Stop Loss
$29.16
Holding Period
2-7 trading days
Expected Return
+$0.44
Exp. Reward
+$1.29
Exp. Risk
-$0.85

Expected figures are probability-weighted from our historical pattern database; Trade R:R is measured from the entry, target and stop levels.

Current Setup
GDS is forming a post-collapse recovery pattern at $32.00, positioned 34.17% below its 52-week high and 18.65% above its 52-week low. The structure score of 15.0/15 reflects a well-defined recovery shape, with key support at $29.12 and resistance at $36.07. Volume remains subdued at 86% of the 20-day average (1.42M shares), limiting the breakout score to 11.17/13. The pattern suggests modest recovery momentum with a 58.84% historical win probability, though the setup displays moderate risk-reward characteristics given the overall score of 63.18/98.
Stock Context
GDS reported Q2 2026 results on August 13, 2026, with net revenue of RMB3,088.0 million (US$455.1 million) up 6.5% year-over-year and net income of RMB837.6 million (US$123.5 million), compared to a net loss in Q2 2025. The company revised 2026 full-year revenue guidance upward to RMB12,700–13,000 million (11.1%–13.7% growth) and Adjusted EBITDA to RMB5,900–6,100 million. Q1 2026 showed stronger momentum with net revenue up 23.6% YoY to RMB3,367.1 million and net income surging 247.1% YoY to RMB2,652.1 million. This post-Q2 earnings environment—where guidance expansion contrasts with near-flat recent performance—explains the recovery pattern forming as investor sentiment stabilizes after a three-month drawdown.
What to Expect
A successful breakout above the $36.07 resistance would target a measured move to $34.52 (conservative estimate). Volume confirmation is critical; current volume sits at 86% of average, so breakout conviction requires above-average participation to validate the recovery. The pattern invalidates decisively below $29.12 support, representing a 9% downside risk from current price. At 58.84% win probability, historical data shows this setup succeeds more often than fails, though RSI at 47.98 indicates neutral momentum without overbought/oversold extremes.
Risk Factors
The technical setup carries moderate warning signals. Q2 Adjusted EBITDA growth decelerated to only 2.5% YoY compared to 47.2% YoY growth in Q1, signaling momentum loss in core operations. MACD histogram is negative at -0.1639, suggesting underlying weakness despite price recovery. Volume deficit (86% of average) reduces breakout conviction—a pattern recovery without volume support is prone to false breakouts. The three-month return of -7.75% reflects prolonged weakness that may indicate sector or competitive headwinds not yet resolved. Beta of 1.07 signals moderate volatility amplification; any broader market pullback would pressure this recovery pattern acutely. No imminent earnings date eliminates near-term catalyst, leaving recovery contingent on sentiment persistence alone.
How We Find and Score This Setup
We scan more than 6,000 NYSE and NASDAQ stocks every trading day and compare each detected pattern against a database of 370,000+ historical detections. Every setup is scored across three dimensions: Structure, Volume, and Breakout Readiness. Win probability is a calibrated estimate of how similar historical setups performed over the following 10 trading days. This is a swing trading tool built for multi-day holds. It is not built or tested for day trading.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GDS a good swing trade?
GDS scored 63 out of 98 on our post collapse recovery scan, with a 59% historical win probability over a 2-7 trading days hold. Moderate setup based on our systematic scoring.
What is the entry, target, and stop loss for this setup?
The setup's reference price is $32.00, with a conservative target of $34.52 and a stop loss at $29.16.
What would invalidate this post collapse recovery setup?
A close below the stop loss at $29.16 would invalidate the setup and suggest the pattern has failed.
How is the win probability calculated?
Win probability is a calibrated estimate of how similar historical post collapse recovery setups performed over the following 10 trading days, drawn from a database of 370,000+ historical pattern detections across 6,000+ NYSE and NASDAQ stocks.
Market & Sector Regime
Market
Bullish 0.63
-1.0 0 +1.0
Technology Sector
Bullish 0.95
-1.0 0 +1.0
Overall Score
37 of 40
Exceptional
Pattern Quality
10 of 20
Fair
Setup
11 of 20
Fair
R/R
5 of 18
Weak
Context
Pattern Quality Score
15 of 15
Exceptional
Structure
11 of 13
Strong
Breakout
11 of 12
Exceptional
Volume
Recent Performance
+0.5%
1W
+0.8%
2W
+0.1%
1M
-7.8%
3M
Momentum & Trend
RSI (14)
48.0
Neutral
MACD Histogram
-0.16
Bearish
Bollinger Band Position
34.6%
Mid Zone
Volatility & Risk
20-Day Volatility
0.46
High
ATR %
3.9%
Medium
Beta
1.07
Market
Volume Analysis
Volume Ratio
0.86x
Average
20-Day Avg Vol
1.7M
shares / day
Current Volume
1.4M
shares traded
Price Levels
52W High
$48.61
Resistance
$36.07
Target
$34.52
Current
$32.00
Stop Loss
$29.16
Support
$29.12
52W Low
$26.97
Disclaimer: This analysis is algorithmically generated for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past pattern performance does not guarantee future results. Win probabilities are based on historical data across 370,000+ observations. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor. AI-assisted contextual analysis by Claude (Anthropic). Indicators reflect values at time of detection.