LAZ: Symmetrical Triangle detected on 17 Aug 2026

All prices, scores, and news on this page reflect data available before market open on .

Browse all Symmetrical Triangle detections →

On 17 Aug 2026, our scan flagged LAZ as a symmetrical triangle setup scoring 72 out of 98 (Good tier), with a 58% win probability based on our historical pattern database and a 0.4 to 1 reward to risk ratio. This is a swing trade setup: win probability reflects a 10 trading day hold, not an intraday move. At $44.64, the conservative target is $46.66 with a stop at $42.47.

Overall Score
72 of 98
Good
Win Probability
58%
Low
Reward / Risk
0.4 : 1
$0.28 reward $-0.63 risk
Swing Trading Plan
Entry
$44.64
Target
$46.66
Stop Loss
$42.47
Holding Period
Up to 10 trading days
Win Probability
58%
Current Setup
LAZ is forming a symmetrical triangle as the stock oscillates between compressed support near $42.85 and resistance at $44.26, with current price at $44.64 just above this structure. The breakout score of 12/13 and volume score of 9/12 suggest moderate pattern conviction—current volume is running 19% below the 20-day average at 1.44M shares, which represents relative weakness for breakout confirmation. Structure score of 10/15 flags this as a tighter, lower-quality triangle. The overall 72-point score reflects a competent but not exceptional setup, with 58% win probability indicating below-average edge historically.
Stock Context
Lazard reported Q2 2026 revenue of $807.7M (down 1.2% YoY) with net income falling to just $4.8M as profitability weakened sharply. However, preliminary AUM reached $284.7B as of June 30, 2026, with positive net flows of $7.4B for H1 2026, signaling underlying asset gathering momentum. The stock drew investor attention after the weak earnings via an expanded share repurchase authorization and affirmed quarterly dividend of $0.50/share. Six analysts offer LAZ price targets in the last 6 months with a median of $48.00, providing modest upside incentive. Recent AUM updates to $286.9B as of July 31, 2026, bolstered by acquisitions like Truvvo Partners, highlight portfolio diversification efforts. The stock is rallying on management confidence signals despite earnings headwinds.
What to Expect
A decisive breakout above $44.26 would target $46.66 (conservative measure), representing 4.5% upside from current levels. Volume confirmation on breakout is critical—historically symmetrical triangles confirm with 20-30% above average volume; at present, daily turnover must exceed 2.1M shares for conviction. The pattern invalidates decisively below $42.85, which would signal reversal below the consolidation. With 58% win probability, this setup is marginally favourable but requires tight risk management. A failed breakout from this triangle would likely lead to sideways range continuation rather than sharp reversal.
Risk Factors
Net income of $4.8M and diluted EPS of $0.03 represent material deterioration despite revenue stability, reflecting elevated costs and softer operating leverage. LAZ's highly cyclical business model, recent revenue declines, and questionable Lazard 2030 revenue-doubling targets raise fundamental concerns about sustainability. The stock carries elevated beta of 2.31, meaning a market pullback would accelerate downside pressure. In May 2026, stock fell 9.1% on AUM update noise, signaling sentiment fragility around asset management announcements. Current consolidation after a weak earnings quarter suggests cautious institutional positioning. Dividend at 4.3% yield provides some downside cushion, but any further earnings deterioration or M&A disappointment could trigger technical breakdown below support.
How We Find and Score This Setup
We scan more than 6,000 NYSE and NASDAQ stocks every trading day and compare each detected pattern against a database of 370,000+ historical detections. Every setup is scored across three dimensions: Structure, Volume, and Breakout Readiness. Win probability is a calibrated estimate of how similar historical setups performed over the following 10 trading days. This is a swing trading tool built for multi-day holds. It is not built or tested for day trading.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is LAZ a good swing trade?
LAZ scored 72 out of 98 on our symmetrical triangle scan, with a 58% historical win probability over the standard 10 trading day hold. Good setup based on our systematic scoring.
What is the entry, target, and stop loss for this setup?
The setup's reference price is $44.64, with a conservative target of $46.66 and a stop loss at $42.47.
What would invalidate this symmetrical triangle setup?
A close below the stop loss at $42.47 would invalidate the setup and suggest the pattern has failed.
How is the win probability calculated?
Win probability is a calibrated estimate of how similar historical symmetrical triangle setups performed over the following 10 trading days, drawn from a database of 370,000+ historical pattern detections across 6,000+ NYSE and NASDAQ stocks.
Market & Sector Regime
Market
Bullish 0.90
-1.0 0 +1.0
Finance Sector
Bullish 0.60
-1.0 0 +1.0
Overall Score
31 of 40
Good
Pattern Quality
18 of 20
Exceptional
Setup
9 of 20
Weak
R/R
14 of 18
Good
Context
Pattern Quality Score
10 of 15
Moderate
Structure
12 of 13
Exceptional
Breakout
9 of 12
Good
Volume
Recent Performance
+1.0%
1W
+6.6%
2W
+3.9%
1M
-1.7%
3M
Momentum & Trend
RSI (14)
56.1
Neutral
MACD Histogram
+0.23
Bullish
Bollinger Band Position
83.8%
Upper Zone
Volatility & Risk
20-Day Volatility
0.41
High
ATR %
3.7%
Medium
Beta
2.31
High Beta
Volume Analysis
Volume Ratio
0.81x
Average
20-Day Avg Vol
1.8M
shares / day
Current Volume
1.4M
shares traded
Price Levels
52W High
$57.45
Target
$46.66
Current
$44.64
Resistance
$44.26
Support
$42.85
Stop Loss
$42.47
52W Low
$37.82
Disclaimer: This analysis is algorithmically generated for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Past pattern performance does not guarantee future results. Win probabilities are based on historical data across 370,000+ observations. Always conduct your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor. AI-assisted contextual analysis by Claude (Anthropic). Indicators reflect values at time of detection.